Zaki Naguib Mahmoud
Zaki Naguib Mahmoud (1905-1993), one of the leading figures in
modern Arabic philosophy. Well known for his emphasis on scientific knowledge,
and by his pro analytic and logical positivist philosophy, in his first phase,
and for a combinatory scientific/Islamic view in his second phase.
His Life
Zaki Naguib Mahmoud was born in
Journalism
On 1933 he started writing articles
about philosophy and social thought in the new magazine 'the mission' (Al-resala in Arabic), which has been issued by the famous
group of thinkers known as 'the committee of authorship and translation and
publishing'. After quite some time of appearance of his continual articles in
the magazine he joined Ahmad Amin and Ahmad Hassan Al-Zayat, who headed the
committee and the magazine, in publishing and reviewing major philosophy books.
In this period they issued 'The story of Greek philosophy', and 'The story of
modern philosophy', among other reviews and translations. During this period
the magazine 'the culture' (Al-thaqafa, in Arabic)
has appeared by the same committee and he became a member of its editors and
participated in publishing articles in it.
On 1965 he was appointed by the
Egyptian ministry of culture to issue and head a new magazine oriented toward
contemporary philosophical thought. He issued such a magazine under the title
'Contemporary thought' and headed its board of editors and contributed in
writing in it by a monthly column titled 'Philosophical trends', and continued
his responsibility till 1968 when he traveled to Kuwait.
After his return to
Academic Life
On 1944 Zaki Naguib left
to
When he came back, he was appointed as
a lecturer, then, assistant professor and finally professor of philosophy at
the Faculty of Arts,
Zaki Naguib Mahmoud was given the
State Incentive Award in 1960, State Merit Award in 1970, Arab Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization Award in 1984 and The American University
in Cairo Honorary Doctorate in 1985.
His Thought
Zaki Naguib Mahmoud's thought can be
divided into two or three phases, according to the measure we use to approach
and evaluate it. In the general meaning of the term 'thought' it is evident
according to his own writings as well as other scholars that he passed through
three phases of thinking.
Evolution of his thought
Zaki Naguib has started his intellectual live, in its first
phase, with a religious if not Sufi position in which he defended religious
miracles, human freedom as well as metaphysical contemplation of human life. It
is believed that such a phase extends till his studies for PhD and has reached
its peak in his dissertation 'self- determination'. In this work he attacked
Hume's empiricism as well as behaviorism in their refuse of the concept of the
psych. Following this attack he purported to support the view of objective free
will of human psych or mind, albeit with the acknowledgement of the
deterministic nature of his environment as well as his own constitution
determined through history.
His second phase of thought begins in
the late forties and early fifties of the twenties century. Zaki Naguib has been exposed during his study in
In particular, in 'The Myth of
Metaphysics', he empathized on the well known idea of the Logical Positivists
that non-scientific phrases that can not be verified scientifically are void of
objective meaning. This was understood by the wider community as an indirect
rejection of religion in general and Islamic religion in particular. The book
has invoked a storm of attack and criticism to its topic and to the author. In
a late response, 1984, Zaki Naguib
has reprinted the book with a slightly moderate title 'A Stance from
Metaphysics'.
The third and last period has clarified
itself during the period he stayed in
However, if we adopt a strict philosophical measure in assessing his works we would
be speaking about two phases of philosophical thought. Moreover, these two
phases should be understood within one philosophical theme that comprises the
essence of his philosophy.
His Philosophy
Zaki Naguib's philosophy can be found in one recurrent theme
which constitutes the driving motive behind his successive views and phases. According
to his own interpretation in his intellectual autobiography 'A story of a
mind', we may present such a central theme in one phrase 'Scientific thinking
as a basic social value'. His central problem was, as much as every thinker in
the Arabic modernist era, how to transform a backward society like our present
Arabic and Islamic societies into an advanced one. The answer was, in his view,
to get rid of superstitious and irrational ways of thinking, and replace them by
scientific thinking.
Hence, his enthusiasm for 'Logical
Positivism' was essentially a pragmatic move, his vision was that he can make
use of this philosophical/scientific construct to uplift and boost his central
idea. However, we should say that his writings during the first phase do not
show any provisions, deviations or partial criticism of this philosophy. Hence,
we can conclude correctly that such a pragmatic explanation of his position at
that period applies only on the subconscious level, in which contradictions of
this view with his traditional convictions has been running on the subconscious
level.
In any case, 'Scientific thinking', as
an absent value in our societies, has taken for him the form of a philosophical
project. The basic aim of such a project is to push toward implementing such
thinking in the society, and the means with which this goal will be achieved is
the position of logical positivism, or 'scientific empiricism', the term he
prefers. Success in this project requires positive reception form the society,
which happened partially on the intellectual as well as governmental levels,
but not on the general and lay person one.
Hence, in the second phase, his believe
in 'scientific thinking' as a necessary societal value, remained the same but
in the form of an underlying structure covered by the study and analysis of the rational trends of Islamic
heritage. Therefore, once again, the study of Islamic heritage was a pragmatic
move in order to overcome resistance against his call for 'scientific
thinking'.
This becomes perfectly clear if one analyses
any of his articles and books in his second stage. The underlying message
remains the same albeit with different terms. In addition, this method- a
superstructure of Islamic analysis founded on a scientific if not positivist
concepts – represented his response to the difficult question of Authenticity
and Modernity. In brief, his view can be epitomized as follows: we should not
abandon our intellectual heritage in order to achieve modernity, for this would
be some form of a cultural suicide, instead we stress and use the rational and
intellectual part of it in conjunction with contemporary advancements of
scientific and objective philosophical thought.
If we want to classify his philosophy
from the point of view of the degree of abstractness and its relation to real
life, then we would say that Dr. Zaki Naguib lines up with those philosophers who expressed their
philosophy through literature and art rather than through building metaphysical
constructs. For, he did not build a metaphysical construct, despite his use of
'Logical positivism' in its abstract form. In this sense he is closer to
Sartre, Nietzsche and Kierkegaard, in modern ages, and to Abu Hayan Altawhidi in ancient Arabic
philosophy than to Russell, Kant and Ibn Rusd. Hence he was rightly referred to as 'the philosopher
of literature writers and the writer of the philosophers'.
His Works
Zaki Naguib has
authored more than forty books and countless articles in different magazines
and newspapers; following is a list of his Works:
A-
In Philosophy
1-
On Positivist Logic, two parts
·
On
Formal Logic, 1951
·
On
Philosophy of Science, 1952
2-
David Hume, 1951
3-
The Myth of Metaphysics, 1953
4-
Theory of Knowledge, 1956
5-
Bertrand Russell, 1956
6-
The Live of Thought in the
7-
Toward a Scientific Philosophy,
1959
8-
The Artist East, 1960
9-
Jaber Ibn Hayan, 1961
B-
In Arabic Modernity
1-
Renewal of Arabic Thought, 1973
2-
The Rational and the Irrational
in Our Intellectual heritage, 1975
3-
Our Culture in Front of Contemporary Time, 1976
4-
In Our Mental Live, 1979
5-
With Poets, 1980
6-
This Time and Its Culture, 1980
7-
From a Philosophical Point of
View, 1980
8-
Preoccupations of Intellectuals,
1981
9-
Thoughts and Positions, 1983
10-
A
New Society Or a Disaster, 1983
11-
A
Story of A Mind, 1984
12-
In
a Conjunction, 1985
13-
About
Freedom I am Talking, 1986
14-
An
Islamic Vision, 1987
15-
On
Modernization of Arabic Culture, 1988
16-
An
Arabic Between Two Cultures, 1990
17-
The
Outcome of the Years, 1991
C-
Literature Writings
1-
The Lands of The Dreams, 1939
2-
Shakespeare, 1943
3-
The
4-
Shreds of Glass, 1947
5-
A
6-
With the Revolution on the
Doors, 1955
7-
Days in
8-
A Story of a Psych, 1965
D-
Writings in English
1-
Translations of Al-Akkad Poetry, 1945
2-
PhD Dissertation titled 'Self
Determination", 1947
3-
The Land and People of
E-
Translations
a-
In Philosophy
1-
Four Dialogues of Plato, 1936
2-
The Rich and the Poor, H. G.
Wales, 1937
3-
History of Western Philosophy,
Bertrand Russell, 1954
4-
Logic, a Theory of Research,
John Dewy, 1959,
b-
In Collaboration with Ahmad Amin
1-
The Story of Greek Philosophy,
1935
2-
The Story of Modern Philosophy,
1936
3-
The Story of Literature, in
three parts
·
On
Ancient and medieval Literature, 1943
·
On
Modern Literature, 1945
·
On
Eastern and Western Literature in the 19th century, 1948
c-
In Cultural History and
Literature Critique
1-
The Arts of Literature, H. T Charlton,
1944
2-
I Preferred Freedom, Vector Crafetchenco, 1944
3-
The Story of Civilization, Will
Durant, Thee books of the 1st
volume,
·
The Appearance of Civilization,
1950
·
·
4-
The Heritage of Middle Ages,
1967